Honda Ridgeline Owners Reviews

Honda Ridgeline Owners Reviews

honda, hidgeline, reviews, forums, accessories, truck, test, drive


Honda Fit
Click here to go to the original topic

 
       Honda Ridgeline Owners Reviews Forum Index -> General Automotive News
::  
Author Message
colorider



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Location: Loveland, Colorado

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:52 am    Post subject: Honda Fit  

Pretty impressive, for a car in this category. The Honda Fit gets a nice review at Edmunds.
Back to top  
CR-V



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 309

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Re: Honda Fit  

Just my 02 Honda has got a winner here for an entry level car, in particular should fuel prices spike this summer. And the Honda Diesel will be on the North American door step in the future.
http://automobiles.honda.com/fit/?from=fit.honda.com
http://www.honda.co.uk/change/
Back to top  
bigdave269



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 1204
Location: Santa Clarita

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Honda Fit  



I saw a blurb about this car in Car and Driver this month. I am sure they will be doing a comparison with the Scion xA soon enough. Suzuki Reno/Chevy Aveo and the Hyundai Elantra are the other 4-doors in this class. 2-doors include the Ford Focus and the Mini Cooper, and even the VW Golf if they want to expand it to a big shootout. Personally, I would put my money on the Honda. It's cute, too!
Back to top  
CR-V



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 309

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Honda Fit  

Bang on we Honda guys don't settle for second best. Numerous post's on the Honda Fit (Jazz version Europe) at link. The North American version has got to be a cut above. The American Tuners will love this Baby ! Don't know what gives with this site not even a mention of the Ridge ????
http://www.honda-tech.com/zeromain
Back to top  
bigdave269



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 1204
Location: Santa Clarita

Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:14 pm    Post subject:  

I don't think the Ridge has caught the eye of the tuners....
Back to top  
Hazcat



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 52

Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 10:34 pm    Post subject: Re: Honda Fit  

Have y'all driven it yet? It is a blast. It looks dinky but has more room than my old civic. What is impressive is it is so stable. It doesn't handle at all like a roller skate like I'd expect, very nimble. The semis didn't blow it around AT ALL. It's not quite like it, but I kept flashing back to when I took the Lexus IS300 out on a track when it first came out. It's just as crisp, though it's FWD and not a rocket, but fast enough to be quite fun.

I think the main reason I insisted on taking it out was that the Jazz was declared "Cool" on the BBC show, Top Gear.

Alas, the spousal type is still thinking about a sedate, bland Accord. Besides, Hazcat don't pay over MSRP for anything.
Back to top  
bigdave269



Joined: 02 Oct 2005
Posts: 1204
Location: Santa Clarita

Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 12:18 am    Post subject:  

Short Take Review: 2007 Honda Fit Sport Automatic

Dispelling gearhead wisdom that subcompact automatics have to be a drag.
BY TONY SWAN
CAR AND DRIVER
July 2006


This is not widely understood, but we have no conceptual problem with small, basic-transportation cars. Particularly now. For anyone interested in preserving the negotiable contents of one’s pockets, small cars make big sense, and the more fuel prices soar, the more sense they make. Beyond that, the penalties we once associated with small cars — noise, spartan accommodations, primitive amenities, motor-scooter power — are essentially gone.

Where we have had reservations regarding small cars is when we encounter one whose limited power resources are further drained by an automatic transmission. Generally speaking, self-shifting plus modest power yields a car whose role in life seems to be getting in the way. And in a country where most drivers don’t want to be bothered with — or are perhaps incapable of — manipulating a clutch and shift lever, the majority of the vehicles on our public roads are equipped with automatic transmissions.

So there’s this institutional prejudice we harbor when we plant our backsides into any automatic-equipped subcompact. Which is precisely what makes the Honda Fit Sport automatic a pleasant surprise. As subcompact automatics go, it actually goes. Okay, 0 to 60 mph in 10.4 seconds isn’t likely to produce brownouts in your peripheral vision. The manual Fit Sport in our May comparo, “$15,000 Cheap Skates,” did the same sprint in 8.7 seconds. But it’s not bad for cars at this end of the spectrum, it’s far more entertaining to operate than competing automatics, and it’s well suited to urban driving.

The key to all of this is the Fit’s five-speed transmission. That’s five forward speeds, as distinct from the four-speed autos offered by most other subcompacts on the market. Five speeds are obviously a better bet for optimizing the thrift-oriented power of the Fit’s 1.5-liter SOHC 16-valve long-stroke VTEC four: 109 horsepower at 5800 rpm, 105 pound-feet of torque at 4800 rpm. Even better, the Fit’s automatic includes paddle shifters and a manumatic function that’s essentially bimodal. Tap the paddles when the lever is in the normal drive mode, and you’ll achieve upshifts or downshifts that will hang on until the transmission management computer decides, on the basis of what you’re doing with the throttle, that you’re finished with that gear and it’s time to move on.

Or, if you’re feeling frisky, slide the lever back to the “S” position, and make your gear choices with the paddle shifters. The transmission holds selections as long as you like, shifts are brisk, and using the paddles yields quicker acceleration, reflected in our test results — a half-second to 60 mph. Or leave it in drive and simply go with the flow. The Fit Sport automatic is no urban street guerrilla, but it doesn’t have any trouble keeping up with traffic.

The automatic commands an $800 price premium on the $15,720 Fit Sport, and it’s a pretty sophisticated piece of equipment for a car in this class. The product planners chose this transmission over a continuously variable one because they felt a conventional automatic was a better bet for the U.S. market — that is, sportier, and also more compatible with the paddle-shift setup. Honda was able to finesse some of the five-speed’s cost by using the gearbox case and shafts from the ’06 Civic’s five-speed auto, although the internal gearing is obviously unique to the Fit’s more modest power.

So, would we opt for a Fit Sport automatic? Whoa — that’s going a bit far. At the end of the day, we still think the operation of a good manual gearbox — the Fit’s standard transmission is arguably the best in its class — enhances the relationship between car and driver. But for the urban driver who doesn’t need much involvement and wants economy without excessive sacrifice in the realm of comfort and convenience, the Fit automatic is a very good, uh [here it comes; we knew he couldn’t resist this indefinitely — Ed.] fit.

Vehicle type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 5-door wagon
Price as tested: $16,520 (base price: $15,720)
Engine type: SOHC 16-valve inline-4, aluminum block and head, port fuel injection
Displacement: 91 cu in, 1497cc
Power (SAE net): 109 bhp @ 5800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 105 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm

Transmission: 5-speed automatic with manumatic shifting
Wheelbase: 96.5 in
Length/width/height: 157.4/66.2/60.0 in
Curb weight: 2560 lb

Zero to 60 mph: 10.4 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 44.2 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 11.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 17.8 sec @ 78 mph
Top speed (drag limited): 110 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 176 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.75 g
EPA fuel economy, city driving: 31 mpg

2006 New York Auto Show Preview
Back to top  
 
       Honda Ridgeline Owners Reviews Forum Index -> General Automotive News
Page 1 of 1




Powered by phpBB 2.0.17 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT
[ IntegraMOD © 2004 Ronald John David ]